angels-and-angles:

As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is…

When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she searches for a smarter, richer, and more handsome boyfriend. There is little you can do without feeling like a dick. All in all, one of the meanest things a girl can do, whether they mean it or not.”

and ”The perennial location of nice guys everywhere.”

Although this hypothetical situation could work both ways, friendzone is almost always applied to a man who is rejected by a woman. Therefore, there is something inherently unequal, something inherently sexist about the term “friendzone”. But what and why?

From my experience, this is what friend zone is. A “nice guy” pursues a woman, but isn’t forward with his intentions from the get-go like, say, a “jerk”. The woman is pleased to see a man who is interested in her not as a sexual object but as a human being and wishes for things to stay that way. The man is not satisfied with seeing the woman as a human being because being “expected to support a girl” is a bad deal if she’s not putting out.

Before I delve into the sociological aspects of this, I just want to point out that ”friendzone” is no more pleasant for a woman than it is a man. First, that is to say unrequited love works both ways, but the person who doesn’t return affections is considered mean only when she’s a woman. And second, what option does the woman have in a traditional “friendzone” situation? Just stop talking to a close friend to avoid “leading him on”? In high school, I found out my best friend of 2 years liked me. Having to tell him I didn’t feel the same way and being immediately ex-communicated via Facebook status (“Thanks for wasting my time”) was one of the worst things that ever happened to me. Were our two years of friendship invalid because I didn’t want anything more? Was all our time together really wasted because there was no hypothetical pay off?

Guys who do this and claim to be “nice guys” are the worst misogynists because of their sense of entitlement toward a woman. They make investments in property and expect their dividends. They are fake friends. They are selfish. And they will jump at the chance to vilify you and victimize themselves when their attempts at manipulation don’t work. Clearly, “friendzone” is the remnant of a phenomenon that has plagued women since the beginning of time: women are not independent creatures. Our love lives exist only in the context of a man’s desire. When we make independent decisions, we are subject to a host of derogatory terms. “Slut” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “yes”. “Friendzone” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “no”

tagged as → #TRUEDAT
  1. freakss-and-geekss reblogged this from wtfniceguys
  2. queen-of-the-shire reblogged this from happy-pigeons
  3. acomplexsimpleton reblogged this from happy-pigeons
  4. happy-pigeons reblogged this from happy-pigeons
  5. elshroom reblogged this from eladarling
  6. solitudeisblind reblogged this from wtfniceguys
  7. 22flames reblogged this from wtfniceguys
  8. goblinish reblogged this from andathe
  9. yourhumblemechslave reblogged this from wtfniceguys
  10. armageddon-annie reblogged this from kebbl
  11. kebbl reblogged this from thechargingsky
  12. spacegod87 reblogged this from thechargingsky
  13. theiridescentstar reblogged this from uncommonsensicle
  14. notjustwandering reblogged this from yourmomreblogsme
  15. yourmomreblogsme reblogged this from andathe and added:
    As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is… “When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she...
  16. meesterzebra reblogged this from gandalfey
  17. kingofthepineapples reblogged this from silentsermon
  18. nonsumhicsum reblogged this from silentsermon
  19. hiddenfearsoftheheart reblogged this from silentsermon
  20. tardis-landing-at-221b reblogged this from lightsoutlockdown
  21. dumbalaskan reblogged this from silentsermon